🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising group of nations are considering similar restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our children's innocence". The policy could be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have stated that an similar ban could be "one of the tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on the legislature to enact a proposal raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised families to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for minors without guardian approval is granted. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a solid foundation," said one European lawmaker behind the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the government has kept open a potential ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by conclusive data".

Last year, interest built behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to further research the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. One foundation established by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after encountering disturbing online content contends that a strict age ban may not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for children," commented a influential peer.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, action is largely happening at the regional level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure prohibiting under-14s from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra use needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced measures mandating guardian approval for teenagers to open social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from some figures to follow the Australian example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Beyond these regions, further states are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, world organizations take a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

While this global discussion evolves, the actions of Australia and its followers demonstrate that policymakers globally are increasingly content to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.