Moscow Demands Significant Sum in Damages from Clearing House Regarding Seized Funds

The Russian central bank has announced it is pursuing compensation amounting to $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This legal step is a clear response from the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize frozen Russian state funds to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on reports in Russian news outlets, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.

European Union officials will determine in the coming days on a proposal to use around €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a large loan to fund its defence and economic needs.

Most of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution serves as the main keeper for the Russian frozen financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

EU officials have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the fact that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, even though it was frozen in European jurisdictions shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, however, has labeled any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory measures, such as seizing EU corporate assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a prominent position in peace negotiations, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and regain its assets. He added that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

With statements interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a vicious assault on property rights and the international reserves system created by the United States."

Euroclear refused to provide a statement on the latest lawsuit. It has in the past stated it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

Although judges in European nations are unlikely to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to seek implementation in nations with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, if relevant holdings can be located," commented a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials said they are developing measures to discourage other nations from aiding any Russian lawsuits against EU entities. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to shield EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the complex scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds generated from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.

Kyiv would solely be obligated to return the loan in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast destruction inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative method for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unused funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, however, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has already expressed its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear signal that if you cause all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the reparations."
David Garcia
David Garcia

Award-winning journalist with over a decade of experience covering international politics and social justice issues.